Best Stock Screener for US and European Stocks in 2026

The best stock screener for both US and European stocks in 2026 is ScreenerHero. It covers NYSE, NASDAQ, TSX (Canada), and all major European exchanges — XETRA, Euronext Paris, BME, Borsa Italiana, Euronext Amsterdam, Euronext Brussels, Nasdaq First North, EGM Milan, AIM London, and more — with consistent fundamental filters (P/E, P/B, EV/EBITDA, ROE, margins) that work across all markets. The free tier requires no account. Pro is €29/month.

No other screener at this price covers both US and European markets with reliable fundamental data. The most common alternatives — Finviz (US only) and Stockopedia (Europe, with US added at €80/month) — each require paying for two separate tools to match what ScreenerHero provides in one.

Last updated: July 2026.

The problem: most screeners only cover one market

Investment theses don't respect borders. A value investor looking for cheap industrials should be able to compare a US rail company against a German logistics operator. A dividend investor wants the UK's no-withholding-tax advantage alongside US Dividend Aristocrats. A growth investor screening European software should also see US SaaS comparables.

But the screener market is bifurcated:

US-centric screeners (Finviz, StockRover, Barchart) cover NYSE and NASDAQ comprehensively but have little to no European exchange coverage. Finviz — the most-used US screener — covers US stocks only and has since its founding.

European-centric screeners (Stockopedia, MarketScreener) cover UK and continental European exchanges but have incomplete US coverage, or charge a premium for adding US stocks to a European subscription.

Global screeners that claim multi-market coverage (TIKR, TradingView) technically list stocks from both markets but have inconsistent fundamental data — particularly for European small and mid-caps — making multi-market fundamental comparison unreliable.

The result: an investor covering both US and European markets typically needs two separate tools, pays for both, and cannot run cross-market comparison screens without manually exporting and combining data.

Who needs a cross-market screener?

The pan-Atlantic value investor. US equities trade at ~21× trailing P/E; European equities trade at ~14–15×. A systematic value investor looking for the cheapest businesses globally needs to compare both markets simultaneously — running a screen in only one geography by definition misses the cheapest alternatives in the other.

The dividend income investor. US Dividend Aristocrats (25+ years of consecutive increases) are well-documented. European dividend payers — UK financials with no withholding tax, Spanish utilities with high yields, Nordic industrials with conservative payout ratios — are underrepresented in US-only screeners. A complete dividend screen requires both.

The sector-specialist investor. European industrials (XETRA's Mittelstand), French luxury (CAC 40), Nordic technology (First North), Italian small-cap consumer — these are global sector leaders in their domains. A US-only industrial screen misses KION, Rational, DÜRR, and hundreds of others that dominate their niches.

The GARP investor. Growth at a reasonable price requires comparing valuation (P/E, EV/EBITDA) against growth (revenue CAGR, earnings momentum). Running GARP screens only in the US misses European growth companies — particularly Nordic tech on First North — that often trade at significantly lower multiples than US equivalents with comparable growth profiles.

The Canadian investor. Canadian equities (TSX, TSXV) are structurally undercovered by European screeners and underweighted in US ones. Resource-heavy sectors (mining, energy) and Canadian financials offer genuine diversification and are unavailable on most European-facing tools.

Best screeners for US + European markets compared

1. ScreenerHero — Only dedicated cross-market screener at this price

US coverage: NYSE, NASDAQ, NYSE American, OTC (major listings).

European coverage: XETRA (Germany), Euronext Paris (France), BME (Spain), Borsa Italiana (Italy), Euronext Amsterdam (Netherlands), Euronext Brussels (Belgium), Euronext Lisbon (Portugal), Nasdaq First North Stockholm, Copenhagen, Helsinki, Euronext Growth Paris, EGM Milan, GPW Warsaw, AIM London, SIX Swiss Exchange.

Canadian coverage: TSX (Toronto Stock Exchange), TSXV (TSX Venture Exchange).

Cross-market filter consistency: All fundamental filters — P/E, P/B, EV/EBITDA, ROE, net margin, operating margin, revenue growth, dividend yield, debt/equity — work identically across all markets. You can run a P/E < 12, ROE > 15%, EV/EBITDA < 8 screen and receive results from US, European, and Canadian markets in a single sorted list.

Free tier: Full cross-market screener, no account required.

Paid plan: €29/month Pro. Unlimited results, saved screens, export, alerts.

Best for: Any investor who screens across US and European markets simultaneously. The only tool at this price point with reliable fundamental data across both.

2. Stockopedia — European specialist with US as an add-on

US coverage: Available on the most expensive plan (€80/month). US fundamental data is reasonable for large and mid-caps.

European coverage: Strong for UK (Stockopedia's heritage market). Continental European small caps — Euronext Growth, First North, EGM — have data gaps.

Cross-market filter consistency: Stockopedia's StockRanks composite scores (Quality, Value, Momentum) are calculated separately for each geographic region — so rankings are not directly comparable across US and European markets.

Free tier: None.

Paid plan: €60/month (Europe only) · €80/month (US + Europe).

Best for: Investors who prefer composite scoring over raw filter sliders and are willing to pay a premium for the interface. Not ideal for raw cross-market value comparison.

Price to match ScreenerHero's cross-market capability: €80/month — 2.7× more expensive.

3. TIKR — Broad coverage, inconsistent European fundamentals

US coverage: Good. TIKR Pro covers US large and mid-cap stocks comprehensively.

European coverage: 100,000+ stocks claimed across 92 countries. In practice, fundamental data for European small caps — particularly on alternative markets — is inconsistent. Filter results for EV/EBITDA and P/B on Euronext Growth and First North names are often missing.

Cross-market filter consistency: Inconsistent. US screens are reliable; European small cap screens have significant data gaps.

Free tier: Freemium with friction. Account required.

Paid plan: $40–55/month Pro.

Best for: Deep research on individual companies (especially with historical financial data). Not reliable for systematic cross-market screening of European small caps.

4. Finviz — US benchmark, zero European coverage

US coverage: The best US-focused fundamental screener available. 60+ filters across NYSE, NASDAQ, and OTC.

European coverage: Zero. Finviz covers US markets only. A small number of European ADRs are listed (non-native European exchange listings), but primary European exchange coverage does not exist.

Best for: US-only investors. For cross-market screening, Finviz requires pairing with a separate European screener — doubling the tool cost and losing cross-market comparison.

5. TradingView — Global price data, variable fundamentals

US coverage: Good — price data and technical indicators. Fundamental data for large caps is reliable.

European coverage: Price data is broadly available. Fundamental data for European names below €500M market cap is inconsistent. Alternative market coverage (Euronext Growth, First North, EGM) is particularly variable.

Cross-market filter consistency: Technical filters (RSI, moving averages) work consistently across markets. Fundamental filters (P/E, EV/EBITDA) are unreliable for European small caps.

Free tier: Account required.

Paid plan: $15–60/month.

Best for: Chart-driven investors who want global price data. Not the right tool for systematic cross-market fundamental screening.

Cross-market screener comparison table

Practical cross-market screens

Screen 1 — Global quality value

Find the cheapest high-quality businesses across US and European markets:

Run this screen without a geographic filter — let the results come from all markets. Sort by EV/EBITDA ascending. The output will show you the cheapest quality businesses globally. In a typical market, European names will represent 50–70% of the top 50 results because European equities trade at a structural discount to US equivalents.

Screen 2 — Global dividend income

Find the highest-yielding sustainable dividend payers across all markets:

Without a geographic filter, results will include UK financials, Spanish utilities, Nordic industrials, US Dividend Aristocrats, and Canadian resource companies — the full global income opportunity set. Sort by yield descending.

Screen 3 — Global growth at reasonable price (GARP)

Find the fastest-growing companies trading at valuation multiples that justify the growth:

Without a geographic filter, results will include both US technology companies and European growth businesses — Nordic software companies on First North, French tech on Euronext Growth, German software on XETRA — that often trade at lower multiples than US comparables despite similar growth profiles.

The Canadian opportunity: why it belongs in a cross-market screen

Canadian equities are systematically underscreened by both US and European investors. The TSX offers genuine diversification across:

Resources and materials: Canadian miners (Agnico Eagle, First Quantum, Kinross) and energy companies (Canadian Natural Resources, Suncor) offer exposure to commodity cycles at valuations that differ materially from US equivalents.

Canadian financial sector: The six major Canadian banks have maintained dividends through multiple cycles and trade at lower P/E multiples than US bank equivalents with comparable balance sheet quality.

Canadian technology: A growing technology sector — particularly in financial technology, infrastructure software, and software-as-a-service — that is undercovered by European-facing screeners.

Adding TSX to a screener universe materially broadens the investment set and creates genuine cross-market diversification within a single screening workflow.

How to use a cross-market screener effectively

Start without geographic filters. Run your fundamental screen across all markets simultaneously. Let the valuation and quality filters determine which markets rise to the top of the results, rather than pre-selecting a market and then screening within it.

Use market cap to control liquidity. A €50M minimum market cap eliminates most illiquid names across all markets without restricting the geographic universe.

Compare sector-by-sector. The most useful cross-market comparison is within-sector: US industrials vs. German industrials, UK banks vs. Spanish banks, French consumer vs. US consumer staples. Cross-sector P/E comparisons are less useful because sector multiples differ structurally.

Understand withholding tax implications. For dividend screens, European markets have different withholding tax regimes that affect net yield for foreign investors. UK has no dividend withholding tax for non-residents; Germany withholds 26.4%; France 12.8–28%; Spain 19%. The gross yield shown by a screener is not the net yield received. See: Dividend Withholding Tax in Europe.

Frequently asked questions

Is there a single screener that covers both US and European stocks well?

Yes — ScreenerHero covers US (NYSE, NASDAQ), Canadian (TSX, TSXV), and all major European exchanges with consistent fundamental filters. Most other tools cover one market well and the other poorly.

Can Finviz screen European stocks?

No. Finviz covers US markets only. For investors who need cross-market screening, a separate European screener is required alongside Finviz — at additional cost and without the ability to run cross-market comparison screens.

Does Stockopedia cover US stocks?

Yes, but only on the most expensive plan (€80/month). The European-only plan (€60/month) does not include US equities. Stockopedia's US coverage is reasonable for large caps but its strength is UK and European equities.

Why do European stocks trade cheaper than US stocks?

European equities have traded at a persistent 20–40% discount to US equities on P/E and other valuation metrics. Contributing factors include: the sector composition of European indices (more industrials, financials, and energy vs. technology-heavy US indices), lower average GDP growth expectations, and a structural premium assigned to US capital markets. However, many individual European businesses — particularly in industrials, consumer, and healthcare — are direct global competitors to US equivalents while trading at materially lower multiples.

What is the cheapest stock screener that covers both US and Europe?

ScreenerHero at €29/month is the lowest-priced screener with full coverage of both US and major European markets. The free tier covers both markets without an account. The next cheapest cross-market option is Stockopedia at €80/month for US + Europe, or TIKR Pro at $40–55/month with inconsistent European small-cap coverage.

Related guides

• Best European Stock Screener — full comparison focused on European exchanges
• Finviz Alternative for European Stocks — what European investors use instead of Finviz
• Canadian Stocks and TSX Screener — how to screen Canadian equities alongside European and US stocks
• Value Investing in Europe 2026 — why European markets offer compelling value relative to US equities
• GARP Investing in Europe — growth at a reasonable price across European markets
• Dividend Withholding Tax in Europe — tax implications for cross-market dividend investors

Open the cross-market screener → — free, no account required. Filter US, Canadian, and European stocks simultaneously with consistent P/E, EV/EBITDA, ROE, and margin filters. Pro at €29/month.